Gaz's profileGaz's Blog™PhotosBlogLists Tools Help

Blog


    October 25

    Jeremy: An obituary

    Anyone that has been to our house in the past week or two will have met Jeremy – especially at the party last night where he was far from a sociable chap though seems to have gone down very well. It is with a heavy heart, then, that I announce the unfortunate demise of Jeremy as he sits, dismembered, in our hallway.

     

    For those of you that don’t know what in blazes I’m talking about, allow me to recount the entire story. Around two weeks ago, a prank was hatched very much off the cuff. John decided to hide a large box in Scott’s room (both and, incidentally, probably all of the names mentioned herein are housemates) and did so by disguising it as a man (In Scott’s clothes) and propping him up in his dirty laundry hamper. This feat was soon exaggerated as Scott’s clothes were stuffed with a towel and attached to one another to form Jeremy. The clinching factor? Jeremy’s ‘face’ is a mask of the Joker from the dark knight film.

     

    Jeremy was then placed in various places around the house, much to the terror of everyone. He might be waiting in a shadowed room, or outside your door. Likewise, he could be sat on the toilet or hanging from the stairs. One never really knew where or when Jeremy would next strike, though it was decided to bring Jeremy out for the premature Hallowe’en [Microsoft word tells me that this is an incorrect spelling, but I know better] party and allow him to meet more people.

     

    Over the course of the evening, then, Jeremy was sat next to, around and on and gradually assumed a more unorthodox shape. He currently exists as two halves of an effigy littered about our hall. How the mighty have fallen or, in this case, been dismembered.


    Gaz out.

    September 20

    Bat out of Hell

    I'm fairly sure that anyone who knows me will appreciate my love for Meat Loaf or, as this blog has come to know him, Mr Loaf. Such a love affair spans back years since I first listened to the 'best of' album that was released way back when. I saw an advert for it on telly and, already knowing Bat out of Hell, decided to expand my knowledge of the artist and, evidently, was pleased with what I found.

    Now, it has recently come to my attention that the entire Bat out of Hell trilogy might be one long concept album. ("I'm sure Meat Loaf would be happy for you to think that", replied Mitch.) Though my madness shall shortly be made manifest, indluge me for a while. Mr Loaf's album Welcome to the Neighbourhood is definitely a concept album, detailing a love story going from teenage lust (Where the rubber meets the road) through to a relationship (Original Sin and 45 seconds of ecstacy) to betrayal (Left in the dark), forgiveness (Amnesty is granted) and finally a happy ending many, many years later (Martha, Where Angels Sing). If you don't believe me I invite you to listen to the whole thing and try and visualise it as a soundtrack to a romantic comedy.

    Now - Bat out of Hell. I've not managed to tie all three albums together completely yet, though there is a definite heaven and hell theme outside just titles. The trilogy starts with the eponymous track, whilst the second album ends with Back into Hell featuring a remix of the guitar solo from Good Girls go to Heaven (Bad Girls go everywhere). The third album then starts with The monster's loose and ends with Cry to heaven. So Mr Loaf escapes from hell, returns and escapes once more, this time for good? It's a thought.

    Gaz out.
    September 06

    Coco before censorship

    Why do they keep pushing the boundaries and keep forcing me to write stuff like this? Is there some sort of conspiracy to somehow force me to become the posterboy against political correctness gone mad or is it just some sort of illusion of grandeur on my part? Regardless, I present to you the latest bafflingly interventionist nonsense courtesy of the BMA, brought to my attention by Monsieur Bergs.

    You may or may not be aware of the recent film detailing the life and times of Coco Chanel, the icon of the fashion world entitled “Coco before Chanel”. Now, I’m not going to comment on the film as a whole as I haven’t seen it and, quite frankly, have no real wish to see it barring the detail that the lead role is played by the same girl that place Amélie in the film of the same name. (I quite like her – she’s a good actress and attractive to boot.) However, I do have to comment on the blatant censorship involved in the film’s posters. Regard:

    Original film poster
    Edited film poster [1]
    Edited film poster [2]

    You don’t have to be an expert at spot the difference to be able to judge what has gone amiss. What’s even more infuriating is that this isn’t just some poor photoshop job (the pen one, admittedly, is very well done but still not more permissable) but the actual edited poster. In the words of the BMA: “Film stars who smoke on screen should attract the attention of the censor in the same way as they would if they were engaged in extreme sex or violence”. Alright, so most people in today’s day and age would agree that smoking is damaging to your health and should not be condoned. However, I’m also a stickler for historical accuracy and – guess what? - people smoked in the days of Coco Chanel. Coco died in 1971, long before smoking was popularly lambasted as a cause of cancer and many people smoked in those days. Hell, while we’re at it should we remove the drinking and swearing from the film as well, lest we all turn into potty-mouthed alcoholics. If nothing else, it just looks plain silly. For example, regard Coco sans cigarette and instead appearing to be doing a poor impression of the Queen:



    Reductio ad absurdum, you may cry. But I regard this as a serious step. I agree with not being able to smoke inside and not being able to advertise for cigarettes, though an attempt to completely remove them from the past is stupid. Ought we go back and remaster Casablanca to remove the cigarettes as well? What about Breakfast at Tiffany’s? Both are iconic, the latter perhaps specifically for the shot of Ms Hepburn with a cigarette in hand.

    Whilst we’re at it, a related point: I’m fairly sure that, given the end of the world, someone somewhere will swear at one point or another. Call it a foolish hunch if you will, though I’m pretty certain there would be the odd cuss word floating about as an asteroid or nuclear bomb headed towards earth. I digress, though. Smoking may not be condonable, but that certainly doesn’t make it editable. Let’s put a bit of money into schools and start teaching common sense, shall we? Just because it happens on the big screen doesn’t mean it should happen in real life. I would have thought that the veritable lack of supervillains might have taught us that.

    Gaz out.

    [Source for the BMA: http://www.melonfarmers.co.uk/storymf00261.htm ]
    July 10

    What not to drink...

    I’m reminded of the innumerable times I’ve heard the phrase ‘just say no’ muttered in jest, sincerity and a mixture of the two from varying sources when I [try to] recall the events of Tuesday night. I’m also reminded of how spectacularly I failed to do such an apparently simple task (so the diminutive clause would suggest, anyway) on said night, hence the events that I struggle to recall on Tuesday night. I wish, therefore, to put a qualifier with the phrase ’just say no’, and comment that one must ‘just say no when presented with a drink that costs more than £4 and from a mixture of taps and optics’.
     
    All in all, both the idea and attempt by a large portion of the horde to drink the seven stars dry were exemplary. I think everyone had at least six drinks, some having many, many more (no names mentioned, mind) and so my hearty congratulations to everyone.
     
    Personally, I thought my own inevitably messy end was sealed when I entrusted my drink choices to Alan and Mitch. Forgetting momentarily that they had avowed earlier in the night to get me, in my own words, rollock-titted, and having already consumed four beers of various origins, they presented me with their creation. This and subsequent drinks lack a formal cocktail name to the best of my knowledge, though I’m fairly sure they can be best surmised as ludicrous. This said, I heartily recommend them to anyone with a stomach of steel and a wallet thicker than the standard misogynist target.

    • Double Vodka and Flat Cap (Local Ale)
    • Half Cider, Half Toby (Bitter), Double Vermouth
    • Cider and Pernod
    • Cider and Curvoisier

    Of the four, my personal favourite was the Cider and Pernod, though this may have been in contrast to the unequivocal foulness of the preceding drink. Alas, after the last drink I managed to negotiate my way into the waiting taxi where I quickly decided that I didn’t like to have my eyes open whilst it was moving. As a result of my sitting there with eyes closed and enough alcohol in my system to allow me to piss a reasonably fortified cocktail I quickly fell to sleep.

    Upon being nudged into life again back in Manchester I struggled to stand, opting for the classic 45 degree slant rather than the proven much more successful vertical position and was promptly ushered into the house where I made a beeline (if anyone’s actually observed a bee fly then the use here is far more accurate than is implied in standard handling of the phrase) for the front room. The first chair I attempted to sit on pulled itself out from underneath me and so I decided to go for a different chair, reassuring the cabinet facing me insistently that no one saw me. After the second chair joined the same league as the first, I decided to sit on the floor for a while lest my continued spinning and falling inspire me to reproduce one of Jackson Pollock’s great works on the living room floor.

    I’m fairly sure the moral of this story is self-evidential, though it remains to be seen whether it will actually make the slightest difference to anyone, anywhere or ever. Alas, I’ve declared myself teetotal for a few hours in order to recover though I’m unsure how successful I’ll be. All’s fair in love, war and binge drinking, I guess.

    Gaz out.

    March 17

    Monotony

    Tory monotony.

    Tory motonony.

    Nory motonoty.

    Noty motonory.

    Noto motynory.

    Not motoynory.

    Not mytonoroy.

    Not my toronoy.

    Not my norotoy.

    Not my notoroy.

    Whatever that means.

    Gaz out.
    March 10

    Legacy

    I'm not overly sure what the title pertains to, nor with what it was originally intended to be used. However, I'm on Chris' computer and, short of actually asking Chris was 'legacy' entails (for that would be far too simple) I shall instead continue to speculate a little while longer. In my head. So that you can't see what I'm thinking which, for once, might make something of a welcome change.

    Anyway, I want to talk of a little gripe of mine at present: my cold. Granted it's lifting at the moment though I still feel it worth mentioning - for it can safely be said that I'm nowhere near as phlegmy as once I was nor do I have the strange compulsion to blow my nose at twenty second intervals though I have been a little bit worse of wear and thus I wanted to fill you in on all the gruesome details in the glorious technicolour of that strange yellowy-green shade that we all know so well.

    I have come to the conclusion then that, just as Shakespeare described the seven ages of man, there are the seven ages of the cold, which I shall attempt to outline below. It might be worthwhile to note, however, that this only applies to me, though I guess there'll be a significant overlap with most people. (Let me know if you have anything different.)

    Stage one: Nothing. You've contracted the cold but you're really not aware of it.
    Stage two:
    Feeling a little bit shitty, maybe a little tired with a bit of a headache.
    Stage three: Sniffles start.
    Stage four: Sniffles turn into a full-blown avalanche. Lack of appetite. Innate desire to just sleep.
    Stage five: Sniffles start to dry up, cough begins.
    Stage six: Sniffles experience a slight resurgance though the cough is otherwise gone, or has turned into that annoying type where you can't do a proper cough and instead sound like you're trying to mimic a rusty chainsaw.
    Stage seven: Cold all but gone, but you accept you've probably just got a little bit more to go.

    Anyway, I'm being compelled to go and play super smash bros. with Chris and John, and thus shall depart your company for now. Tot ziens.

    Gaz out.
    February 23

    Memory. ...now, if only I could remember what I really wanted to say.

    I should really get better at remembering to do this - considering not only the amount of time that I've been Lenten blogging (three weeks now?) but also the several years' practice I've had at churning out lacklustre ramblings about n'importe quoi. Anyway, I was out tonight when, surprise surprise, I suddenly recalled that I hadn't blogged yet today. A few frantic texts later and someone was ready to stand in for me - though I managed to get home before the 12am limit and thus had time to churn out one of my own - and thus the stand-in stood down, much to my dismay, as what was written was of a very good quality and certainly fitting to such a high-class institution as Gaz's Blog. I shall pander him about it later, though, rest assured.

    On such a slow news day as today, then, what better things can one do but focus on the wackier and possible even sordid news stories floating about on the net? (Well, I can think of several things that are each in themselves significantly more fun than browsing google news - especially in Dutch and French in an attempt to find the weirdest stories - though I doubt many of them are suitable to mention here, even if it is past the watershed.) As weird stories go, though, this one takes the biscuit;

    "TOKYO (Reuters) - A Japanese man was arrested for trespassing this week after turning up at a high school dressed in a girl's uniform and a long wig, local police said.

    Thirty-nine-year-old Tetsunori Nanpei told police he had bought the uniform over the Internet and put it on to take a stroll near the school in Saitama, north of Tokyo, on Wednesday, the daily Asahi Shimbun said.

    When students standing outside the gates started to scream at the sight of him, he dashed inside the school grounds, hoping to blend in with the crowds of teenagers, the paper said.

    They also screamed, forcing the man to flee, losing his wig in the process. A school clerk pursued him and stopped him at a nearby riverbank, the paper said."

    Now, would I be entirely out of order in asking 'what in the name of everything that is even in the remotest bit holy is going on there'? Apparently no further details are being released. I appreciate that this could be construed as a very serious problem - paedophilia and all - but the whole thing is laughable to the extent that its something people in cartoons might try to pull off.

    Other 'news' stories that are worth a chuckle include publishing oddities and stuff we really didn't need to know about George Bush.

    Gaz out.

    February 16

    "Oh, you're German? I'm sorry, I thought there was something wrong with you..."

    I was going to go and look for a worthwhile quote concerning Germany when I realised John Cleese's classic from the German episode of Fawlty Towers and figured there was a little else that could and would succeed that as the most fitting quote for this blog on; well, if you haven't guessed it by now I doubt you ever will; Germans.

    A little background on the inspiration of the topic first - it was suggested by Jack, whom I met in Lanzarote this summer. He and his friends ran into a little trouble concerning three German holiday makers - each of whom (all three of them) pulled a German, all from the same group. They arranged to meet them for food the night after and never did so, frightened by their stalking capabilities (Germans, it would appear, are excellent trackers) - and all was peachy until myself and aforementioned three Brits descended on the town only to find them again and spend the following four days trying to escape them.

    Irrelevant story I realise, though I thought it might be nice to have a little trip down memory lane. So, Germans. Short of falling into the usual stereotype trap of Germans, I shall instead quote from The Onion's atlas of the world; (It's probably also worth noting that my favourite German song, Spieluhr by Rammstein, just came on by complete chance.)

    "Genocide-free since April 11, 1946"

    The rest of the two-page spread on Germany follows in much the same suit. If were perfectly honest, I doubt Germans will ever be allowed to forget (or at least never stop being reminded by the pesky allies that happened to win the second world war) that they once hoisted some gimpy Austrian with a dodgy moustache and monorchidism to a position of supreme power and then let him do what he wished on the continent. I don't think it's harsh that we do so; each country has its particular historical stereotype that it shall forever hold [at least in my mind]. In the same way that I shall always look upon France as a bunch of cheese-eating surrender monkeys after the past millennium and Argentina as a bunch of stuck-up meddlers after the events of the 1980s, Germany has acquired its own cultural stigma in the form of the Nazis. In fairness, it was quite late for it to develop - Most of Western Europe had developed ideas hundreds (thousands) of years beforehand - starting maybe with the Ancient Greeks and Romans, or, before that ever, the Celts [Irish]. I know it's quite a harsh idea to keep attached to a country, but that's just the way the cookie crumbles, I guess - they'll have this one until they do something worse (and, in which case, they'll complain 'Vhy can't ve go back to ze gut old dayz of ze Nazi jokes, hrm?').

    Anyway, I fear I'm exhausting an already rather chronically-fatigued topic, and so on that note I shall desist. A point of interest, though - it's exactly six months until my birthday I just realised by choosing the date of posting for this article. Best get saving, yeah?

    Gaz out.

    February 11

    One hundred million... er... seconds

    Yes, you heard right. Thanks to some extensive number crunching on the part of myself, I managed to work out that today, the 11th February 2008 marks the 100,000,000th second of operation for Gaz's Blog. I'm not quite sure when in the day such a momentous second falls, though one can be sure that, by 11:59:59 tonight, Gaz's Blog will have been operational for between exactly one hundred million and 100,086,399 seconds, given the amount of possible seconds the time in question can fall upon.

    I know, I know, I've been promising to do a blog on Solipsism for some time now, though I figure this was far more pressing, and wouldn't have the same stupendous awesomeness as if it were to be talked about in a couple of days' time. Such a precedent established, I think I might gloat a little while longer - hell, you'll have blinked approximately 250 million times since I first started the Blog, so surely you can spare a couple more?

    I'd also like to take this opportunity to thank everyone - absolutely everyone - who has ever contributed to the blog: be it by writing an article, finding out an obscure fact that forms the basis of a post, giving me inspiration, leaving a comment, supporting it financially (thank you Ste), quoting it in general conversation (it does happen), taking the views onboard or just sitting there and reading it; be it for the full length of its operation or just in the past few weeks, or even days. A great big thank you to all of you. Christ, at the very least, I wouldn't have achieved the 60,000 hits that I have done without all of you, so I can be thankful for that at least, I guess.

    By my reckoning, it's going to be 2011 before I hit 200,000,000 seconds, which will be the next major milestone, I feel. That gives me plenty of time to get another few hundred blogs out there on topics not yet covered (there mustn't be that many left now, surely?) and to amass another couple of ten thousand views. On this track, we'll have passed 100k views by then and my my - won't that be a day to remember?

    Anyway - Tomorrow: Solipsism. (Sorry for the wait, Francisco.)

    Gaz out.

    December 12

    Celebrating 26,304 hours of blogging excellence

    It’s been three years since Serge Vohor, former Vanuatu prime minister, was forced from office following a vote of no confidence as, indeed, it has been three years since doctors in Austria confirmed Viktor Yushchenko’s poisoning was due to dioxin poisoning and Bernard Kerik withdrew his nomination for homeland secretary.

    So what?

    It’s also three years to the day that Gaz’s Blog™ was created. On this day, a most monumental of days, I recounted the events of a days shopping in town and something of a phenomenon was born. So, 1,095 days, roughly 500 entries and 58,600 views across the whole world later we arrive at our present point. I can’t help but thank every single person who has even viewed, commented, contributed to, recommended, linked to, criticised, appeared in, been ridiculed in and provided inspiration for the blogs during their long and so far adventurous lifetime. Thanks.

    The more observant of you will also notice that this was meant to be posted yesterday (the 11th), however I managed to forget, and was away from the laptop for the rest of the day, with now being the soonest I’ve been reunited with the story with a view to posting it. Luckily, a friend of mine (Martin, by name) stepped in and sent me a very good and very insightful blog into law and order (or the lack thereof, as the case may be) and made sure that the third birthday didn’t pass unblogged. Cheers, Martin.

    The good news is that the good news is still spreading. New people flock to the Blog™ every day; every new entry is posted onto facebook by an RSS feed as well as shameless plugs with practically everyone I meet. People continue to give me inspiration (as well as reasons to fear the sanity of humanity as a race) and, so long as that continues, so shall the Blog™.

    What, then, do we have to look forward to? Well, besides lots of blogging genius and more focusing on the little things of life that are blown horrendously out of proportion; lots more. As we move into the fifth year of operation (2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008) I’m sure we can expect lots of themed blogs, perhaps even with a few videos thrown in for good measure.

    And now for the numerically minded I shall shamelessly multiply the time that Gaz’s Blog™ has been in operation, just for shits and giggles:

    3 years
    36 months
    156 weeks
    1,095 days
    26,280 hours
    1,567,800 minutes
    94,608,000 seconds (Yes, Gaz’s Blog™ will celebrate it’s 100,000,000th second of operation on February 11th, 2008!)

    Impressive stuff, no? No? Screw you then.

    Gaz out.

    December 03

    On being damp.

    It’s bucketing down, raining cats and dogs and generally pissing it down. Why yes, this week is the week that Manchester has finally decided to reveal its true colours to resident students who seemed to have, by now, been lulled into some sort of horrifically false reality wherein Manchester has something of an average rainfall. If I were pessimistic (which I’m highly tempted to be), then I’d announce proudly that it was probably only going to get worse and to look on the bright side that at least the wind hasn’t gotten up yet or that the thunder and lightning haven’t started firing. (Not that the odd thunderstorm bothers me, mind. See an earlier blog for examples as such.)
     
    So, I live in Manchester and it’s wet. What’s new? Well, nothing really, except for the fact that today, for some bizarre reason, it didn’t bother me at all. I mean, most people can walk in a light drizzle, the kind that, despite fears of inciting popular culture, ‘soaks you through’, though today for far from that. To give you an idea of what sort of magnitude of weather we’re dealing with, allow me to illustrate with some pictures;
     
     
    And critically compare this with;
     
     
    Severe, eh? Now, the point is that it didn’t bother me, and that I’m not overly sure why it didn’t. I refused the temptation to walk under the awnings of shops to spend a little more time getting soaked to the skin and smiled willingly at people cowering under umbrellas (and doubly so as said umbrellas were caught in an up draught and promptly inverted themselves).
     
    To bring this round nicely (and both ironically and dramatically, as it would appear that Carl Orff has decided to play his greatest works through my laptop) to the opening comments of the blog – why do we Brits have so many idioms and terms for the rain? Certainly, the stereotype of us being obsessed with the weather mustn’t be far wrong – as seen in me deciding to devote an entire blog to the study of the weather) – but I wonder why we can’t focus on something more interesting like, well, anything.
     
    Gaz out.
    May 13

    Eurovisionology

    Okay, so I’ll admit it – I watched Eurovision last night. I am quite, quite ashamed, though that doesn’t subtract from the fact that it got me thinking and predicting (with quite startling accuracy) which countries would vote for who, along the principle of block (or bloc) voting. It spoils the whole thing, really, as it means that the countries that don’t have a lot of European friends (or many at all, like Italy) stand next to no chance when juxtaposed next to, say, Serbia, who has billions of close friends in its former-Yugoslavian clique. I was trying to convince Lord Warman that certain counties would vote for one another, and that some wouldn’t on principle (unless it was a really good act), but to no avail. And so I drew a map, visible at the bottom of the entry.
     
    It’s colour coded as follows and refers to groups that vote for one another a lot;
     
    Blue: UK and former UK dominions in Europe
    Muddy Brown: France and French-speaking countries
    Green: Iberian Peninsula buddies
    Red: Germans
    Orange: Balkan states
    Cyan: Greece and Cyprus – best friends forever?
    Purple: Former Soviet Bloc
    Yellow: Scandinavia
    Black: No friends, or at least not in Europe.
     
    I also drew a crossed line between countries that wouldn’t vote for each other on principle. (UK/France, Germany/Poland, Finland/Russia, Turkey/Greece and Cyprus.)
     
    Oh, and in case you wanted to see our shocking entry that landed us second from bottom – as well as some that are equally apocalyptically awful, here you go.
     
    UK
    Ukraine

    France (How on earth did they get the same score as us?)
     
    Gaz out.
    April 20

    On the right, in the Right; Part I.

    There comes a time in everyone’s life where something you once thought was cool  and looked up to is shattered, and the pieces left to be dissected by your mind over the coming hours – be it shattered by something done, said, sung or written is regardless, however it remains universal. Today, I was listening to system of a down and some of the lesser known songs wandered onto the playlist – much to my dismay, the lyrics of which were distinctly left-winged. I’m not meaning that they hinted at helping the poor or anything of that nature – that just socially-minded, not socialist. What I mean is the likes of;
     
    “Why don't presidents fight the war?/ Why do they always send the poor?"
     
     (Taken from B.Y.O.B. (Bring Your Own Bombs).)
     
    Now, I’m not going to focus my attack on SOAD, as it’s far too narrow-minded of me. Instead, I’m going to attempt to clarify a few things for those that think that being left wing is ‘cool’ and ‘trendy’. Let it be known, however, that I am very disappointed in SOAD.
    Now, some of the buzz words in any left-winger’s vocabulary are ‘poor’, ‘war’ and ‘system’, which all usually come together in one way or another. Perhaps we should deal with each in turn? Why yes, I thought it was a good idea as well.
     
    First, the poor. There will always be poor people, as communism will never work. This isn’t just me being fascist and pooh-poohing other ideas, but stating a known fact. It starts off nice and dandy and then people start getting greedy. I doubt you’ll ever get a group of people who are all perfectly happy to share everything physical with one another without one trying to take advantage of it somehow. Granted, we can try and help people in the third world, however the only way to help them is to somehow bring peace to the regions affected, which all boils down to human envy and greed again – this, mixed with the African experience (suffering, poverty, sorrow etc.) makes for some pretty grim political situations with juntas at each other’s throats constantly. I don’t think anyone has any idea of how to solve the problem of poverty, but Communism sure as hell doesn’t and will not work.
     
    And then there’s the poor in the developed world. What do they do to try and get themselves out of the poverty trap? Nothing, it would seem. Call me arrogant and naïve, but drugs and crime don’t appear ideal ways to be taken seriously and offered help, do they? Come to your senses, lefties. No amount of generosity will help these people – they need to be pulled up, slapped, and sent to the nearest job agency post haste. You can give tramps money to your heart’s content, but you’d do them more of a favour to give them food or yell obscenely at them to get a job. They may take notice if enough people do it.
     
    Now, war. This one’s a biggie, and don’t think for one minute I’m trying to justify the wars in Afghanistan or Iraq. I don’t think that war is right – I do however consider it essential for humans to wage war. That may appear to be something of a contradiction, and so I’d ask you to listen carefully – war is good for the economy, if you follow the Keynesian theory of economics, which states that the more a Government spends, the more it can offset a depression, by creating a wartime market. (I’m no economist, so don’t try and debate the finer points of it, I’m just giving it a gist.) War has always been around, and will always be around, and people that stand against it only make fools of themselves as they slowly realise that nothing they will say or do will ever make Governments realise it. Consider, for a moment, that war was not engrained in the human psyche and that we did so because of some external influence, (much to the contrary of what I happen to believe, though I’m pre-empting any rebuttals,) then we’ve come too far down the line to ever go back. Assume that one day, all the countries disarm. It’s then a flat-out race to build the first atomic bomb and blackmail all the other countries into doing exactly what such a country wants done. It wouldn’t work. Even if we had choice in the matter at the beginning, war and weaponry are now essential for survival of whole populations, not just smaller factions – live with it.
     
    Finally, “the system”- by which the lefties refer to the Government and the power of the Government over the people; the Government machine if you will. Again, people need to be led, or else there would be anarchy, and the biggest group would just win through sheer manpower. The system is what keeps people regulated and within parameters to keep other people safe. Okay, so it doesn’t work sometimes, but nothing’s perfect. (For example, the word ‘Perfect’ is myogenically a misspelling of the word ‘Prefect’, though some awkward sods would argue the exact opposite.) You want to know the way to reduce the control of the ‘system’ on your lives? Vote for a group that supports small Government and lessening bureaucracy, like, oh, I don’t know… The Conservatives.
     
    My conclusion? Lefties are stupid. Further, they fail to understand that everything they complain about is the fault of everyone else perpetuating that which they complain of and, if they were to have their wishes, they probably wouldn’t have the freedom to express their views anyway. Remember, kids; On the right, in the Right.
     
    Gaz out.
    April 12

    Oh. Canada.

    So – I go away to North America for a week, endure the torturous, screaming-kid-behind-you, unnecessary-rules-and-regulations, full-body-grope, stale-air-smelling twenty four hour journey back to the good old green and pleasant land to find that suddenly we’re in the middle of summer. Flip flops and shorts abound, people sit outside drinking everything from water to “what-the-hell?” and the temperature has only just poked its over-cautious nose over the 15 degree mark. Madness, true madness, I tell you. That said, it’s quite nice to come back from the frozen wastelands of Saskatchewan to some leaves on the trees and being able to see the floor and feel your fingers.

    One thing did occur to me on the flight(s) back over, though. You know the whole palaver about seatbelts? (That they need to be fastened during take-off, landing and turbulence, to spell it out for you, in case you didn’t know.) What’s the point in it at all? Granted they are very useful psychological tools to somehow coax people into the illusion that, whilst they sit in a giant metal can 30,000 feet above the ground, they are quite safe from harm because they have a piece of material around their waste, though what good would it be in a crash situation? Presuming you survive the impact, then wearing the seatbelt would essentially garrotte you – if not slice you clean in two. Now, I’m not some malwisher that wants to look at the downside to everything, but I just don’t see the point. (That said, buckle up kids – they keep the cabin crew happy, and you don’t want an enraged gay guy with a trolley full of hot beverages on your case [metaphorical or physical - imagine seeing that one on the baggage carousel], do you?)

    I would also go into great detail about the incompetence on a Costa-style scale today at a Canadian coffee shop, however that would be nasty of me. Suffice to say, I was left thinking, rather clearly “Look, I asked for a fecking donut and a mocha, not if you would like to discuss complex logarithmical formulae half-submerged in the river ganges.”

    Gaz out.

    March 27

    Summer has sprung... wait...

    It would appear that summer has arrived, and in both forms. The first is the arrival of British Summer Time, which is, on the whole, a pain in the arse, as it means it’s dark again when I get up, plus I lose an hour’s sleep, which is never ever good. However, it’s counterpart is much better news, as it would appear that the summer weather flown in from somewhere suitably exotic to make us all feel a bit happier and a lot stickier.

    Only last week it was snowing and in the minuses in the daytime. Now it’s gloriously sunny and everyone I’ve spoken to has the same summer vibe – there’s a certain mist in the air that makes it hard to see objects past a certain distance, there’s a halo of clouds around the horizon and a breeze that flutters by occasionally that genuinely makes you feel glad it hit you. People are having lunch outside, wearing sunglasses and shorts (though that could be British pre-emptiveness more than anything,) and starting to mow their lawns, which just adds to the summer vibe. Rinse and repeat. Also, it is worth noting that I detest the word ‘vibe’, however feel it’s the only real way to sum up what I’m trying to describe. Zeitgeist, Atmosphere and sens (not ‘sense’, it’s a French word for a certain feeling that one might get any any one time) might also be apt terminology, though all are a bit too specific for my liking. Not as hippy-y though.

    Also, before I go, I would like to stress the following point: The next person that ‘tags’ me via whatever program sends them out will have their genitals forcibly removed (or inserted and then removed in the case of any female or pre-castrated idiots) and then minced before their very eyes into a fine milkshake, sold to Selfridges and will then be forced, at gunpoint, to not only drink their own bodily parts, but to pay extortionate prices for the privilege.

    Gaz out.

    March 01

    Sod's law

    It has been brought to my attention that my blogs are getting, on the whole, far too serious and insightful for some people and so, in a fantastic show of both collaboration and defiance, I have decided to be insightful about something that’s not really very serious at all. At least not for me which, quite frankly, is the only opinion that really matters as I’m sure you’ll agree. (Or else you’d be wrong.) Now we have that established, let us continue.
     
    Sod’s law. Also known as Murphy’s law by stupid people unable to tell the two apart. (Sod’s law focuses on the mocking by fate of you, whilst Murphy’s law says that if there’s a way that can result in chaos, that way will occur. I guess Murphy’s is thus a lot more passive, and Sod’s law is God’s sense of humour.) The French seem to think that it’s the devil “C’est bien le diable que…” (‘It really is the devil that…’), but they’re just silly. Essentially, what can go wrong will go wrong. Finagle’s law goes one step further to say that it will go wrong at the worst possible time; say it beginning to rain on the way to a job interview and without an umbrella.
     
    So, why focus on Sod’s law? Well, like all laws – there’s a way to break them. That said, we have to be clear on the specifics of the law itself before we can break it, hence my previous paragraph. I think that the logical way to approach this most delicate of matters is the head-on horns-blaring approach, much like hunting deer and sending in a charging brass band as the preliminary line of attack; let’s list some examples of sod’s law;
     
    - Toast will always land butter-side down. Alternatively, if it hasn’t been buttered, it will land on the side you were going to butter prior to the bread’s hasty suicide attempt.
    - The day you take your umbrella, it will not rain. If you forget it, it will.
    - The one coin that falls out of your hand will be the most expensive one.
    - Things will work perfectly when you’re trying to point out their flaws.
    - The toilet will be occupied when you need it most.
    - The last drink left at a party will be the one nobody likes, and that no one owns up to having brought.
     
    And now some more famous, and all the more hysterical for it, examples;
     
    - Ludwig van Beethoven, legendary composer and music maestro, goes deaf at the age of 26.
    - Adolph Coors III, heir to the Coors beer empire, being allergic to beer.
     
    So, what about you? Give me some of your ideas on Sod’s law and, together, we can prepare for every eventuality.
     
    Gaz out.
    February 10

    Academic, eh?

    Cardinal Saviour have done it again, it would appear. Last night, they headlines Academy 4 and set a new high standard for themselves. The performance itself was electric and must be the best I’ve seen them; Co-ordinated, comfortable with one another and ball-breakingly fantastic. Such was the success of the performance that their call for some crowd members to ‘get naked’ resulted in three shirtless guys, one reduced to his boxers and a bra lobbed at Nathan – hell, it’s a start.  It’s actually refreshing to see how far they’ve come from their first gig in number 15 (back when I was a wee underage drinker) – their stage presence is enhanced, their style’s much clearer and their general attitude is much more crowd-pleasing, rather than directed just at the people they know. In addition, their fanbase has grown exponentially – from the thirty or so that turned up for the first set to the well-over one hundred that turned up last night just to see them – so not including those that just happened to be there. Who knows, they may just get themselves signed soon, and then the sky’s the limit, (and who knows; this review might just get me a free CD).
     
    In fairness, I can’t comment on the other bands for two reasons – primarily that they were all a bit shitty, but further that I was too busy elsewhere doing elsethings, which would total to everything but listening to them.
     
    I realise this isn’t much of a blog™, however I’ve been too busy causing uproar within Caffè Nero and subsequently leaving and joining the prescription pricing division to post here. Also, for the fools who keep feeling it necessary to ask me what my new job entails – I invite you to look at my new employer’s name for a clue. In fact, allow me to spell it out for you all;
     
    Prescription Pricing Division
     
    Gaz out.
    January 29

    And who says that the military isn't silly?

    I tried. I really did try. I scoured the internet for hours upon hours, but to no avail, searching a myriad of sites and using my entire vocabulary to try to bring up new sites on my google and wikipedia searches, but in the end failed miserably. (It also appears that as I try and write this article with lots of amusing pictures, wikipedia manages to falter and crash. Bloody typical.) Anyway, I was perusing the web casually the other day and started, as one does, to browse the varying tombs of the unknown soldier in different countries. Some where lavish, others ceremonial, others quite touching and then I saw the Greek one. Now, before I spark some sort of outrage, I’m not insulting the Greek tomb of the unknown soldier, more the guards thereat. I thought something was awry when I saw these chappies outside;
     

    Now, thinking this to be some sort of fancy dress, I had a look for the main articles on these guys. After all, with a silly hat, shoes that would look out of place at a fancy dress party and some sort of padawan braid straight out of star wars episode 1, I thought it might have been some sort of fancy dress palaver, only to find out that they were actually in traditional Grecian guard ceremonial dress, and they are called Evzones and so I apologise to any Greeks who may well have been offended by my latest description. Anyway, trying my best to keep and open mind and see them as quite dashing, I proceeded to look at the Greek version of the changing of the guard, only to find what looked like a party of drunkards attempting kung fu…
     

    Then two of the three in the foreground get involved…

    Then, I’m afraid, it gets a little bit silly.

    Ah well – if it keeps them happy. I return to what I originally said – I tried and tried, but couldn’t find a sillier uniform, or parade, though I did find out that fascism is not dead, as generally taken. Regard this little gallery of the right;

    That’s the Ruskies (courtesy of Dmitry Amotzsev) and the Finns, just so you know. Oh, and let’s end of a little affirmation of what we suspected all along;

    Gaz out.
    December 11

    Gaz's Blog™ - Celebrating two years of unrelinquishing genius

    It's arrived at last - the first anniversary of the first anniversary of Gaz's Blog™, and this, the first anniversary post for such a celebration to be on time. (If you remember, the celebration was delayed last year by two days because of a hissy fit on the part of NTL.) It only seems fitting to look back over the past year (or maybe past two years, if I run out of things to brag about) of successes on the part of Gaz's Blog™, which has now unofficially come to be known as the North West of England's biggest (and therefore, as I have always taught, best) blog.
     
    Since this time last year, I have amassed some 17,000 views, bringing the total soaring to a mighty 32,000 (give or take). It would only seem fair, then, given this growth curb, that we can aim for 50,000 views by this point in 2007, by which time, Gaz's Blog will be approaching its third anniversary. (Seems a long time away, but the time sure flies.) How will I achieve this epic total? Well, for starters, I branched out recently into video blogging and created Gaz's Vlog™, for a slightly different outtake on events and moods. They're also visible on youtube.com, if you're into that sort of thing, though you don't get the witty puns and snappy layout on there, so I recommend you visit the proper site instead. Also, it is my proud duty to announce the creation of Team GB™. (Yes, it's a witty pun on the Olympic team, however I got to the ™ before they did, so I guess Gaz's Blog™ will be entering a team in the next Olympics. Hoorah.) I will continue to deliver the same high-quality, fantastic, epic (and other such words) blogs™ and maintain the site. However, I decided it was time that some of the regular contributors deserved a bit of recognition, so check out the Team GB™ box on the left hand side of the site.
     
    Anyway, it remains for me to thank those that comment on the blogs™ (and guilt trip those that used to but now don't) and help it to grow and expand - to thank you for visiting, and invite you to add it to your RSS feed. (Click the little orange button at the top to do so.) Until the next time, then, all that remains for me to say is;
     
    Gaz out.

    November 27

    Gaz's Vlog™ is born!

    What ho, there. Well, another year of damned fine blogging™ is drawing to a rather epic conclusion, and so I believe it's time to expand my influence over the world and the mere mortals within it. I pondered over what I've achieved thus far, and came to this rather gratifying list;
     
    • Almost 32,000 views
    • Viewers in more than 50 countries
    • Option to translate the Blog™ into ten languages (more coming, hold on)
    • Musical interludes

    So where does one go from here? Surely there is only a few possible routes with which one can progress - and the one that seemed the most appealing is Video. I looked about the place and assembled a full team of websites to help me with the hosting, displaying and playing of Video Blogs, or, as they are henceforth known for you, the viewer, Vlogs™. Thus, Gaz's Vlog™ is born. Panic not, though - loyal Blogfan™ - Gaz's Blog™ shall remain fully operational - if not more becoming more frequented by witty statements and observations, as now I will be able to refer to Vlogs™ in the Blog™ and likewise in reverse.

    So, where to go from here? Gaz's Vlog™ can be found at http://gazsvlog.blogspot.com, and already has an introductory post and a first Vlog™ propre, so I invite you to view at your leisure. Anyone can leave a comment, so I invite you to do so, or else I shall just end up criticising more and more until I finally find something that touches a nerve. So there.

    Gaz out.